next up previous contents
Next: Remark. Up: Classical Results Interpreted Previous: Aperiodic Points

Lyapunov Exponents

We showed earlier that the separation of orbits initially close to each other occurred at an exponential rate. We would like to examine the Lyapunov exponents of the Gauss map, to see if we can explicitly measure the rate of separation. The Lyapunov exponents of orbits of the Gauss map are defined as [7]

whenever this limit exists. Nearby orbits will separate from the orbit of at an average rate of , after k iterations of G.

Khintchin [14] derived a remarkable theorem with which we could show the Lyapunov exponent of almost all (in the sense of Lebesgue measure) orbits can be shown to be . Easier ways have since been found to establish this result, using ergodic theory. We summarize the ergodic results in the next section. Note that for any rational initial point, the above limit does not exist. Further, for any periodic orbit the calculation can be made explicitly, to give Lyapunov exponents that differ from the almost-everywhere value.

For example, the fixed points have Lyapunov exponents

so there are orbits with arbitrarily large Lyapunov exponents, i.e., orbits that are arbitrarily sensitive to perturbations in the initial point. Note also that for the orbit of e, the limit defining the Lyapunov exponent is infinite. The special case N=1 gives , the golden ratio. Thus , which is smaller than the almost-everywhere Lyapunov exponent. In fact, we have the following:

Theorem. No orbit of the Gauss map has a Lyapunov exponent smaller than .

Proof. Let be any initial point in such that exists. We will show that the product which appears in the definition of must be at least (for N sufficiently large) which will prove the theorem. We consider two subsequent elements and of the orbit of . If k=N, enlarge the product by one term. Note and are related by . If then the contribution of to the product is at least . If instead then so the contribution of to the product is at least . This proves the theorem.





next up previous contents
Next: Remark. Up: Classical Results Interpreted Previous: Aperiodic Points



Rob Corless
Wed Jun 7 09:09:48 PDT 1995