next up previous
Next: The plasticity of language Up: Efficiency in Other Language Previous: Psychological parallels

An argument against structural predisposition

These findings are contrary to theses which support the idea that the brain evolved to support the development of symbolic language and that the human brain is born with a structural sensitivity to syntactic construction, such as Chomsky [13] would suggest. Kanzi's abilities contradict these ideas because none of his ancestors developed language skills in a natural setting, his synaptic functions could not have been prepared to receive language. Moreover, the idea that infants' synaptic functions cannot acquire language skills once a certain level of maturity is reached because of a genetic time clock, is put in perspective. A newer view suggests that as a child reaches maturity, synaptic functions are involved in many tasks that are not necessarily linguistically related. If, during growth, language skills are not developed, synaptic functions that would usually be involved in performing linguistic tasks will be co-opted into performing other tasks[20].


Thalie Prevost
2003-12-24