We set out to confirm that the Ising model can adequately represent phenomena that occur in language evolution.
The methods of physics' formal inquiry usually require a specific
approach that goes beyond heuristics. Data is gathered in a
systematic way. Running an Ising model simulation requires us to set
state parameters to a certain value, let the system relax into its
likeliest state under these set conditions and wait for it to settle.
Once this is done, sample constituents, that are considered representative of the
entire system, are chosen for formal assessment. The state space of
these constituents is mapped out so a formal expression can be stated
that describes the state path of these constituents.
Figure 6.8
illustrates the state space of a typical Ising model that simulates a
first-order phase transition.
|
Because we are modeling language and not H2€0 behavior, we take a more heuristic approach. In the modeling of the phase of H2€0 the values of state parameters refer quite literally to physical states. The mathematical temperature variable of an Ising model is representative of a similar measure used in the observations of real systems. For example; in the simulation of state changes of H2€0, it is relevant that changes occur around Tc€ = 0C. In our simulation, it is not. It only matters that at some critical point there is a state change. It also matters that we can simulate that change as a first-order phase transition. In our case, the mathematical measure of the activity variable does not find a counterpart (that we know of) in the real system of language. Moreover, the use of such a formally well understood model relieves us from solving it. At this point in our research our focus is in the observation of the simulation and assess the relevance of the model to language.